Today we discussed the difference between pseudoscience and natural science.
I would describe that pseudoscience is the untruthful science where a claim is supported by facts that are manipulated in order to persuade or achieve a goal that the author would like to convey. Whereas in natural or any other science would be facts that would back up a claim or a theory.
I would argue that pseudoscience and “the true” science can be hard to distinguish. This is the fact that our sense of perception maybe unable to comprehend the “truth”. I would say that it would be hard to “find the truth” whereas in different where we find a correlation. I believe that the theories that scientists create do not tend to convey the “real” knowledge rather then a correlation or a relationship with a trend.