Overall I like your composition. It has a very nice tune that sounds nice and is very well matched with the piano. The rhythm is also very nice, with variations and also some repetitiveness. I would improve the simplicity of the composition though, as it’s not very playable at the moment.
I think that there is a nice melody on the mallets part and a good use of dynamics. However, I think that there should be have more of a variety of rhythm because it was quite repetitive through out the piece. I also think that it might have been too fast for a mallet player to play. Also, I think that you might want to add a counter melody on the piano part to make the piece more interesting. 🙂
The rhythmic balance in the composition is questionable because you have a lot of sixteenth and eighth notes. I liked you melody though. Your chords aren’t labeled throughout the piece and I think that is going to cost you a lot.
You used a variety of rhythm in your piece. You used a lot of dynamics in your piece. Maybe changing the volume of your piano part, because it is kind of covering the mallets part. I like how you used slurs in your piece to change the articulation and connecting the notes together. The melody is nice and it flows well.
No title. Very simple use of chords but they key change is apparent and fits. Does not seem to have an apparent melody; perhaps the chords are a bit too loud. Semi-consistent rhythmic and melodic balance. Many of your chords are not labelled.
No chord figures. Good use of crescendos and expressions, but only for primary instrument. lack of slurs. Accompaniment covers melody. Interesting melody.
You used a variety of rhythms and the melody is creative. You could have improved by putting more variety to the piano part, and labelling the cadence. You could have also put the title to set up the mood and the overall theme for your composition. There are variety of dynamics and articulations.
Overall I like your composition. It has a very nice tune that sounds nice and is very well matched with the piano. The rhythm is also very nice, with variations and also some repetitiveness. I would improve the simplicity of the composition though, as it’s not very playable at the moment.
I think that there is a nice melody on the mallets part and a good use of dynamics. However, I think that there should be have more of a variety of rhythm because it was quite repetitive through out the piece. I also think that it might have been too fast for a mallet player to play. Also, I think that you might want to add a counter melody on the piano part to make the piece more interesting. 🙂
The rhythmic balance in the composition is questionable because you have a lot of sixteenth and eighth notes. I liked you melody though. Your chords aren’t labeled throughout the piece and I think that is going to cost you a lot.
You used a variety of rhythm in your piece. You used a lot of dynamics in your piece. Maybe changing the volume of your piano part, because it is kind of covering the mallets part. I like how you used slurs in your piece to change the articulation and connecting the notes together. The melody is nice and it flows well.
No title. Very simple use of chords but they key change is apparent and fits. Does not seem to have an apparent melody; perhaps the chords are a bit too loud. Semi-consistent rhythmic and melodic balance. Many of your chords are not labelled.
Lots of dynamics, but you used too much, so it’s notes effective as just using less. Nice Chords, didn’t match melody though. Good effort
No chord figures. Good use of crescendos and expressions, but only for primary instrument. lack of slurs. Accompaniment covers melody. Interesting melody.
You used a variety of rhythms and the melody is creative. You could have improved by putting more variety to the piano part, and labelling the cadence. You could have also put the title to set up the mood and the overall theme for your composition. There are variety of dynamics and articulations.